tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3002022731959835411.post5856042491087892590..comments2023-04-22T08:20:20.747-07:00Comments on <i>homoioteleuton</i>: Romans 15:29 (h.t.)The Deanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12124671837959121334noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3002022731959835411.post-35424478779840844632010-12-19T19:02:30.967-08:002010-12-19T19:02:30.967-08:00Thank you for this correction.
Good spotting. ...Thank you for this correction. <br /><br />Good spotting. The text implies that both TWNs were lost in the Lukan case too. This appears to be incorrect, and Luke 16:21 is as you say, simple h.t. in the case of Sinaiticus at least. <br /><br />peace<br />NazarooNazaroohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03584331774685466296noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3002022731959835411.post-5818350107990434612010-12-15T13:12:11.466-08:002010-12-15T13:12:11.466-08:00Luke 16:21 the missing phrase is YICIWN TWN--not e...Luke 16:21 the missing phrase is YICIWN TWN--not exactly the same situation. Sinaiticus reads,<br />APO TWN PIPTON<br />TWN APO THS TRA _<br />but a corrector has inserted YICIW TWN as a marginal note pointing to the unusually wide space between TWN and PIPTON.<br />Thus in a character string originally reading<br />APOTWNYICIWNTWNPIPTONTWNAPO,<br />the scribe skipped from the first TWN to the second--a simple case of h.t.The White Manhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06732782601569135839noreply@blogger.com